It is not in question that Winston
Churchill was a great man- but insofar as greatness is concerned, I believe
those same traits that raised him above ordinary men can also be attributed to
all of his failures. During the course of his political career until 1940, he
moved from failure to failure, outspoken, extreme, and disliked and mistrusted
by many. He was always acknowledged as brilliant and eloquent, but he was not
liked. This change from mistrusted politician to one of the greatest men of the
20th century, I propose, was not a change in the man himself, but
rather due to a change on the face of Europe.
Mistrust is
not always evoked by poor decisions, although Churchill made some poor
decisions. Mistrust is a feeling rather than a logical, proven judgment of
someone’s character. The peoples’ mistrust of Churchill had less to do with his
policies (although they did pave the way for some poor decisions) and more to
do with his lack of commitment to a party, and his self-assurance against all
others and quite frankly, his attitude. Churchill never doubted himself, and
consequently jumped from party to party depending on which most fell in line
with what he had personally decided was the right choice. He felt no loyalty to
his aristocratic heritage, his party, or any set of beliefs widely held by politicians
or the public. Instead, he pursued what his own brilliant intellect predicted
would happen. In cases where he
was in error, this made him seem bold, ridiculous, and extreme. His speeches,
which matched the needs of the people in WWII, felt out of place on issues in
which people did not strongly agree. Still he spoke on, bold denouncing and
insulting anyone who stood in the way of what he believed.
In the case of the rise of Nazism,
his outspokenness made him fiercely diligent to distrust Hitler and declare
that another war would come. The people of Briton were feeling the effects of depression
and still very much remembered the first world war, and most refused to see the
implications of Hitler’s Germany until it would have been far too late for
action. Churchill’s defiant trust in his own keen insight was his demolition on
issues such as the Dardanelles defeat during WWI, and of Indian home rule, and
yet allowed him unprecedented authority in 1940.
In order to adequately understand
why the British people mistrusted Churchill, it is worth examining why they
trusted him - and trusted him immensely during the course of World War II. The
characteristic of defiant self-appreciation, which made party lines,
bloodlines, and most men below his gaze, was precisely the kind of thing that
could lead Briton to victory. Brilliant as he was, he was remarkably
unquestioning of himself- and so, when men listened to him they did not
question.
I was once told that great men see
what other men do not see. I find no better example of this than the life of
Winston Churchill. The man was brilliant, and the fact was not in question.
However, great political leaders are required to posses more than sight - they
are required to possess strength. Churchill is not a man who it can be said did
everything with accuracy, but he did everything with the belief that he was
accurate, and that is what marks him. Churchill’s belief in himself dominated
all other personal characteristics throughout his life. His authoritativeness
superseded commitment to the position of aristocracy he was born into,
political parties and the ties of any current thought. It is a remarkable human
spirit that can navigate the waters of his own society. There is nothing more
untrustworthy to a people than a politician who will not settle- who constantly
changes his party depending on who best sides with his view, who constantly
stirs up trouble with bold and offensively direct speeches and ideas. In not
all situations was he correct, but he possessed keen insight into history,
which enabled him, often, to accurately assess the future of Europe. Churchill
was undoubtedly in the right place at the right time in 1940. When England was
forced to face a war more horrible than seemed possible, Churchill stepped in.
He spoke boldly and confidently of success, he was born for times of war and
expected to have complete authority, which gave the average man listening to
his words courage to hope. It is a
special kind of genius that fears no man in speaking a truth no man wants to
hear, but it is no little thing that even the Israelites stoned their prophets.